Chevrolet
Hyundai i-flow Concept
Future cars, trucks and development
New for 2011–2013 model years:
- Spark
- Sonic
- Cruze ( In production)
- 9th Gen : Malibu
Blog Archive
History
North America
When Durant sold Chevrolet shares to McLaughlin in 1912, Durant had an idea that McLaughlin was in full production building McLaughlin Cars with Buick power trains(15 year contract Durant had with McLaughlin). Durant felt he could have McLaughlin do with Chevrolet what he did with Buick, and had McLaughlin build his Chevrolets as well. Starting in 1915 in 1916, Durant and the McLaughlin Brothers had traded Chevrolet stock at 5 to 1 and 7 to 1 and took over General Motors holding Company. McLaughlin had no worry about his Buick contract when Billy was back at the helm. General Motors started in Canada in November 20, 1907, McLaughlin and Durant started their company General Motors Holding Company in the USA September 16, 1908. McLaughlin is never addressed by the Ken Kaufmann papers or build documents but takes credit for the Bow Tie information published years before. McLaughlin started Chevrolet trucks in 1919 and General Motors in 1916 became a Corporation. McLaughlin traded the $500,000.00 in Buick stock that Durant had traded him for McLaughlin stock in November 20, 1907. This investment by McLaughlin and Durant gave McLaughlin more ownership in General Motors and Chevrolet in Canada is Building Chevrolet. The truck plant was shut down after building trucks from 1919.China
In 2009, China became Chevrolet's third largest market, with sales of 332,774 vehicles, behind only the United States and Brazil (1,344,629 and 595,500 vehicles respectively).
India
Obama Announces New Standards To Double Vehicle MPG By 2025
Will your next vehicle get much better gas mileage than your current one? Ask most car shoppers and it's a priority.
A new mandate formally announced this morning arguably makes it even more likely you'll find enlarge photo one with significantly higher mpg. The Obama administration and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency have come to an agreement with 13 major automakers—as well as the state of California and its Air Resources Board, and the United Auto Workers (UAW)—about fuel economy. The new standard, which will eventually require a 54.5-mpg fleet average (roughly 163 grams of CO2 per mile), will effectively double the average fuel economy of U.S. vehicles by 2025.
Backed by automakers, and a big move against oil dependence
President Obama cited the rising burden of gasoline costs at a time when budgets are tight, and called the new rules "the single most important step we've ever taken in reducing out nation's dependence on foreign oil." He also argued strongly for taking oil and gas subsidies and funneling the funds toward clean-energy research and "a more balanced approach."
According to the Administration, the new rules, which were reached without the need for legislation, will save U.S. families $1.7 trillion in fuel costs and by 2025 save an average of $8,000 per vehicle. And they're estimated to help save 12 billion barrels of oil and save 2.2 million barrels of oil a day by the time they're fully implemented.
There are massive greenhouse-gas reductions, too; the new rules will cut more than six million metric tons of CO2 by 2025—more than the U.S. emitted in total this past year.
The new regulations build their trajectory from existing rules that apply to model years 2012 through 2016, raising fuel efficiency to a 35.5-mpg fleet average by then—increasing the required fleet average by 3.5 percent each year for five years, then five percent per year after that.
Getting automakers and the State of California involved will also help ease worries about that state trying to enact its own more stringent regulations about fuel economy and CO2.
To achieve the gains, it's likely that we won't see automakers relying broadly on any single technological developments or powertrain types; rather they'll be applying a portfolio of strategies like hybrids , plug-ins, pure electric vehicles, and range-extended electric vehicles.
There's a mid-term evaluation built into the program, in which agencies will be able to evaluate how well the national framework is working—and how well automakers are keeping up. Some environmental groups are already calling foul that this could be a launch point for automakers to stall the incremental improvements, as happened in the 1980s and 1990s.
No comments:
Post a Comment